![]() |
| Don't just lock them up, make them work inside. Jail should be about changing them. |
The debate
about the length of jail sentences for those found guilty of involvement and
incitement of the riots has begun to take off between the doves and hawks on
restorative justice. At first glance, four years for urging a riot on Facebook (but
nothing then happened) can seem harsh. Writing a few words on social media can
result in a sentence twice as long
as actually looting goods from shops may seem disproportionate. Likewise,
six months prison for stealing
bottles of water can seem too much to some. However, if we are serious
about puncturing the arrogant, laid back views of a minority in society who do
not fear jail then these cases may start to have an effect on their attitudes.
If the part of society that gave birth and nurtured the
culture that created the looters, are alarmed at the length of sentence then
the judge has succeeded in getting a message through to them. Over the past ten
years, some social media users in society have become anesthetised to communicating
responsibly. Especially on Facebook and Twitter, communicating has become contorted for some. What they write compared to what they would say face to face has
become dysfunctional. The lonely and aloof aura as they type away on the
keyboard has produced at times vicious, irresponsible and even deluded
messaging. Perhaps the ‘Facebook Two’
sentences will make people stop and think that they are writing in cold reality
and they cannot write anything they feel in that split second.

What is more important than arguing over the length of
sentences is what goes on inside those jails. If they are holding pens and even
training camps to improve the skills of robbers to rob better or increase the environment
of aggression and hostility to inflame the gang culture, then those jails are
failing. One British jail has a re-offending rate of 74%.
That is a failed system.
As I suggested in my previous post
on the riots, we need to get those prisoners out of their cells where they
languish for up to 23 hours and get them working and exercising for say 18
hours.
The point of prison is yes to punish but also and this is
crucial, to change that offender’s behaviour. We need people coming out of jail
who will contribute back positively to society. There is no point whatsoever, ‘locking
them up and throwing away the key’, because apart from the most violent crimes
or severely mentally ill patients, the vast majority will come back out. We need
them getting jobs and not living on benefits. We need them to have learnt from
their spell in jail to teach youngsters to stay on the straight and narrow. We
need those ex-offenders to be volunteering to help the local community. If they
have few working skills, jail should be training them work and life
skills to improve their chances of getting a job.
That is the part of the debate, which seems to be missing.
Long sentences? Fine (case by case) but we need to radically change our prisons
and construct a justice system that transforms wrong doers into stable, working
citizens. Does Cameron have the nuanced understanding of what happened in the riots to produce that radical transformation of our prisons?
![]() |
| Does Cameron understand how to transform jails? |













